DNP 815 Case Report Assessment Description

For this assignment, learners explain how personal knowledge and skills gained in this course assist in solving their Direct Practice Improvement Project practice problem, and how the Christian worldview is supported within your project’s purpose and the project site’s organizational mission and vision.
General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• This assignment uses a template, located in the DNP-815A folder in the DC Network, titled “Case Report: DPI Project Application of Theory to Organizational Mission and Vision, and Christian Worldviews.”
• This assignment requires that at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed, sources related to this topic with at least one in-text citation for each source.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Directions:

Construct a case report (2,000-2,250 words) using your Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project’s purpose, problem, and clinical questions. Apply your chosen nursing theory and evidence-based change model from the Topic 3 assignment to support your DPI Project. Your case report must include the headings provided below. Refer to the “Case Report: DPI Project Application of Theory to Organizational Mission and Vision, and Christian Worldviews” template, located in the DNP-815A folder in the DC Network, to complete your assignment. The specific criteria for this assignment are located on this template.
• Case Report Background
• Christian Worldviews
• Organization’s Mission and Vision to Theory and Model
• Pulling It Together
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:
It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:
Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A
I, (Vera U), verify that I have completed and logged (10 ) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

DNP 815 CASE REPORT ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet My Deadline

Rubric

Case Report: Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview – Rubric
Criteria Description
Case Report Background Problem, Population
5. Excellent
13.5 points
The criteria for the case report are thoroughly and accurately presented. The narrative is well-supported.
4. Good
12.42 points
The criteria for the case report are adequately presented. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.
3. Satisfactory
11.88 points
The criteria for the case report are generally presented. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10.8 points
The case report is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The case report is omitted.
Criteria Description
Christian Worldviews Doctrinal statements (9), Synthesis, and Application
5. Excellent
20.25 points
The doctrinal statements are clearly presented, synthesized, and applied. The narrative is insightful and well written.
4. Good
18.63 points
The doctrinal statements are presented and adequately applied and synthesized.
3. Satisfactory
17.82 points
The doctrinal statements are presented and generally applied and synthesized. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
16.2 points
One doctrinal statement is missing; or, the doctrinal statements are incomplete overall.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The doctrinal statements are omitted.
Criteria Description
Mission and Vision of Organization to Theory and Model Cite Mission and Vision, Connection to Nursing Theory, Connection to Change Model
5. Excellent
20.25 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is thoroughly described. A clear and well-supported connection to nursing theory and change model is established.
4. Good
18.63 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. An adequate connection to nursing theory and change model is established.
3. Satisfactory
17.82 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is outlined. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. A general connection to nursing theory and change model is established.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
16.2 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is omitted.
Criteria Description
Pulling It Together Connect and align purpose to Christian worldview, the mission and vision, and nursing theory and change model; provide examples; incorporate and align with DPI Project.
5. Excellent
20.25 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are thoroughly established. Clear examples are provided. The purpose incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.
4. Good
18.63 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are established. Examples are provided. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. The purpose adequately incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.
3. Satisfactory
17.82 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
16.2 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are omitted.
Criteria Description
Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Model
5. Excellent
13.5 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied throughout and provide clear and strong support for the DPI Project.
4. Good
12.42 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are adequately applied. These provide support for the overall project. Some minor aspects of the project would benefit with further application of the selected theory or model.
3. Satisfactory
11.88 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project. The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are generally applied. Some parts of the project are unsupported.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10.8 points

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 815 Case Report Assessment Description

The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied intermittently or incorrectly. These fail to provide support for the DPI Project
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are not applied.
Criteria Description
Research
5. Excellent
6.75 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
4. Good
6.21 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
3. Satisfactory
5.94 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
6.75 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
6.21 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
5.94 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
6.75 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
6.21 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
5.94 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points<br…< p=””></br…<>