Assignment: NSG 421 Unit 1 Identification of Topic Paper

Assignment: NSG 421 Unit 1 Identification of Topic Paper

Assignment: NSG 421 Unit 1 Identification of Topic Paper

Unit 1: Introduction (Required Content) (1 of 4)

•

Unit 1 Discussion: Introductions (2 of 4)

•

Unit 1 Assessment: ePortfolio, Assignment (3 of 4)

•

Current Assignment: Unit 1 Assignment: Identification of Topic (4 of 4)

Instructions

For this paper, you will choose a specific technology that could be implemented in your current/future workplace or area of interest. You will expand this topic every week. In week 6, you will integrate all the papers into one final paper.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Topic areas should be in the domains of:

1.

Patient Care Delivery

2.

Information Technology and Education

3.

Consumer Health Promotion

4.

Nursing Research and Informatics

Examples might include a web-based education portal, a computer charting system, simulation technologies, social media, eHealth/ePatient, data storage/collection devices, telehealth, medication administration systems, and more.

By Week 6, the parts of your final project will include:

•

Explanation of the technology

•

Benefits of the technology

•

Review of the literature

•

Do not cut and paste your annotated bibliography, but summarize its findings

•

An overview of ethical, legal, safety, and privacy issues with the technology

•

Purpose and goals of implementing this technology

•

An overview of the implementation plan, including a description of the practice area and stakeholders involved

•

Evaluation plan

This Unit 1 written paper will introduce your chosen topic. It should include:

•

An explanation of the technology, its history and integration into the healthcare system presently

•

The benefits of this technology to organizations and to patient care

•

The paper should use correct APA formatting and will include 3 professional references, be 3-4 pages long (excluding the title and references pages), contain an introduction and conclusion, in-text citations, a title page, and a reference page.

Submit your completed paper to this assignment dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.

Rubric

NSG421 Topic ID Rubric

NSG421 Topic ID Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

10 pts

5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.

9 pts

4

Identifies a creative, focused and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.

8 pts

3

Identifies a focused and manageable/ doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.

7 pts

2

Identifies a topic that while manageable/ doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.

6 pts

1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.

0 pts

0

Does not clearly identify a topics that is relative to the assignment.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

10 pts

5

Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.

9 pts

4

Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

8 pts

3

Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.

7 pts

2

Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

6 pts

1

Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

0 pts

0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process

10 pts

5

All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

9 pts

4

Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant

8 pts

3

Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.

7 pts

2

Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.

6 pts

1

Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.

0 pts

0

The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.

10 pts

sub-disciplines.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

10 pts

5

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

9 pts

4

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

8 pts

3

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

7 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

6 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

10 pts

5

States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.

9 pts

4

States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.

8 pts

3

States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.

7 pts

2

States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

6 pts

1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.

0 pts

0

States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

10 pts

5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

9 pts

4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

8 pts

3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

7 pts

2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6 pts

1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0 pts

0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5 pts

5

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

4

The paper exhibits a stronger command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

4 pts

3

The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5 pts

Total Points: 70

PreviousNext