Assignment: NRS 645 Week 5 Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Implementation Plan

Assignment: NRS 645 Week 5 Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Implementation Plan

Assignment: NRS 645 Week 5 Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Implementation Plan

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment will be to begin developing an implementation plan for your project.

In 750-1,000-words, include the following in your plan:

In 1-2 sentences, summarize the problem or issue being addressed by your proposed change project.

Based on the assessment of your practicum site and the literature evaluation you completed in Topic 4, propose how you will address the identified problem or issue (this will be the solution). Solutions should include sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect nursing practice.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Discuss steps for how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal proposed above. In your discussion include the impact it will have on nursing practice.

Write a list of three to five objectives for your proposed intervention. Remember, objectives serve as the goals of your project.

Based on your objectives, develop a list of three to five measurable outcomes for your proposed intervention. Remember, outcomes serve as the tangible, measurable results of implementing your project and should align with your objectives.

Provide a rationale for how your proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-determination) for individuals and diverse populations.

You are required to cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

5.1: Apply quality improvement principles in care delivery.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.8. 3.1, 5.1

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Implementation Plan – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total45 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Summary of Problem

Summarize the problem or issue being addressed by the student’s proposed change project.

0 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student’s proposed change project is missing.

1.69 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student’s proposed change project is incomplete or inaccurate.
1.78 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student’s proposed change project is present but lacks detail.

2 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student’s proposed change project is mostly detailed.

2.25 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student’s proposed change project is thorough and accurate.

Solution (B)

Propose a solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect nursing practice. (C 5.1a) (C5.1)
0 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect nursing practice, is missing.
6.75 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect nursing practice, is incomplete or inaccurate.
7.11 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect nursing practice, is present but lacks detail.
8.01 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect nursing practice, is mostly detailed.
9 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect nursing practice, is thorough and accurate.

Implementation of Intervention

Describe how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including impact it will have on nursing practice.
0 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including impact it will have on nursing practice, is missing.

5.06 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including impact it will have on nursing practice, is incomplete or inaccurate.
5.33 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including impact it will have on nursing practice, is present but lacks detail.

6.01 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including impact it will have on nursing practice, is mostly detailed.
6.75 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including impact it will have on nursing practice, is thorough and accurate.

Objectives

List three to five objectives for the student’s proposed intervention.
0 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student’s proposed intervention is missing.

3.38 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student’s proposed intervention is incomplete or inaccurate.
3.56 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student’s proposed intervention is present but lacks detail.
4.01 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student’s proposed intervention is mostly detailed.

4.5 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student’s proposed intervention is thorough and accurate.

Measurable Outcomes (B)

List three to five measurable outcomes for the student’s proposed intervention. (C 5.1b) (C5.1)
0 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student’s proposed intervention is missing.

3.38 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student’s proposed intervention is incomplete or inaccurate.
3.56 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student’s proposed intervention is present but lacks detail.
4.01 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student’s proposed intervention is mostly detailed.
4.5 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student’s proposed intervention is thorough and accurate.

Rationale

Provide a rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-determination) for individuals and diverse populations.
0 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-determination) for individuals and diverse populations is missing.

3.38 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-determination) for individuals and diverse populations is incomplete or inaccurate.
3.56 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-determination) for individuals and diverse populations is present but lacks detail.
4.01 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-determination) for individuals and diverse populations is mostly detailed.
4.5 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-determination) for individuals and diverse populations is thorough and accurate.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
2.36 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience
2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
2.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
3.15 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

2.36 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
3.15 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
2.03 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
2.13 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2.4 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
2.7 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
2.03 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
2.13 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

2.4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
2.7 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
1.35 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1.42 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
1.6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
1.8 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.