WEEK 10 ASSIGNMENT 2: NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTIES (NONPF) COMPETENCIES/WEEK 10 ASSIGNMENT 2: NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTIES (NONPF) COMPETENCIES/NRNP 6675

Excellent 90%–100%

Response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.

Good 80%–89%

Response clearly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.

Fair 70%–79%

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies or one of the competencies is not addressed.

Poor 0%–69%

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Several of the competencies are not addressed or resposnse is missing.

Excellent 90%–100%

Response clearly and thoroughly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.

Good 80%–89%

Response clearly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.

Fair 70%–79%

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner.

Poor 0%–69%

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner or response is missing.

Excellent 90%–100%

Response clearly and concisely describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Good 80%–89%

Response clearly describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Fair 70%–79%

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Poor 0%–69%

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in, or response is missing.

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Poor 0%–69%

Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3-4 APA format errors.

Poor 0%–69%

Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors.