Assignment: NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
Assignment: NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the dissemination of the Capstone Project Change Proposal PowerPoint developed in Topic 9 and presented this week.
Present the PowerPoint you created in Topic 9 to a group of relevant interdisciplinary leaders or stakeholders at your practicum site.
After presenting your PowerPoint, write a 250-500-word reflection that includes the following:
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation and their role related to the proposed project.
Describe two ways in which you communicated professionally during your presentation.
Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation. Identify any biases that might have affected your presentation of your project.
Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
RN-BSN
6.4: Work with other professions to maintain a climate of mutual learning, respect, and shared values.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.4, 9.2, 10.2
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total10 points
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Acceptable | 5. Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience
Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project. |
0 points
A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is missing. |
1.5 points
A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is incomplete or inaccurate. |
1.58 points
A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is present but lacks detail. |
1.78 points
A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is mostly detailed. |
2 points
A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is thorough. |
Professional Communication
Describe two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation. |
0 points
A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is missing. |
1.88 points
A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is incomplete or inaccurate. |
1.98 points
A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is present but lacks detail. |
2.23 points
A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is mostly detailed. |
2.5 points
A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is thorough. |
Feedback and Biases (B) (B)
Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation. (C6.4) |
0 points
A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is missing. |
1.88 points
A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is incomplete or inaccurate. |
1.98 points
A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is present but lacks detail. |
2.23 points
A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is mostly detailed. |
2.5 points
A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is thorough. |
Interprofessional Collaboration (B) (B)
Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future. (C6.4) |
0 points
A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is missing. |
1.5 points
A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is incomplete or inaccurate. |
1.58 points
A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is present but lacks detail. |
1.78 points
A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is mostly detailed. |
2 points
A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is thorough. |
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. |
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. |
0.75 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. |
0.79 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. |
0.89 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. |
1 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.