NR 393 Week 4 Discussion: Impact of 19th Century Nurses (Graded)

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for learners to explore the contributions of one 19th-century nurse related to leadership and/or provision of care.

Course Outcomes

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 393 Week 4 Discussion: Impact of 19th Century Nurses (Graded)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcome:

CO 1: Describe persons and events in nursing history from the early years through the 19th century related to leadership and provision of care. (PO2)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers. We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Total Points Possible: 50 points

preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion

Important nurses of the 19th century are often overshadowed by Nightingale’s prominence. Select one 19th-century nurse other than Nightingale and describe this person’s contributions to leadership and/or nursing care. We look forward to reading about the nurse you select!

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer Post•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and
•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts

16 pts100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).

16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Sources•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,
•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,
•All sources are credited within the body of the post,
•Evidence supports the discussion, and
•APA format is not required but is encouraged.

12 pts100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply Post•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,
•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and
•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

14 pts100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicates ProfessionallyAll posts:
•are clear and concise,
•are respectful, civil, and caring, and
•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

8 pts100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipationDuring the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):
•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and
•Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 ptsNo Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 ptsPoints Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Total Points: 50

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 393 Week 4 Discussion: Impact of 19th Century Nurses (Graded)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NR 393 Week 4 Discussion: Impact of 19th Century Nurses (Graded)