Assignment: Week 3 Gynecologic Health/NRNP 6552

Assignment: Week 3 Gynecologic Health/NRNP 6552

Assignment: Week 3 Gynecologic Health/NRNP 6552

Gynecologic Health

Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, diagnostic approaches, as well as the development of treatment plans.

For this Case Study Assignment, you will analyze a case study scenario to obtain information related to a comprehensive well-woman exam and determine differential diagnoses, diagnostics, and develop treatment and management plans.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers. We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Schuiling, K. D., & Likis, F. E. (2022). Gynecologic health care (4th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning.

Chapter 10, “Women’s Health After Bariatric Surgery” (pp. 165 – 171)

Curry, S. J., & U.S. Prevent Services Task Force. (2018). Screening for intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults US preventive services task force final recommendation statementLinks to an external site.. JAMA, 320(16), 1678–1687. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14741

Fanslow, J., Wise, M. R., & Marriott, J. (2019). Intimate partner violence and women’s reproductive healthLinks to an external site.. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 29(12), 342–350. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2019.09.003

Lockwood, C. J. (2019). Key points for today’s ‘well-woman’ exam: A guide for ob/gynsLinks to an external site.. Contemporary OB/GYN, 64(1), 23–29. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=134229869&site=ehost-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200

Document: Week 3 Case Studies Download Week 3 Case Studies(PDF)

Document: Week 3 Case Study Template Download Week 3 Case Study Template(Word document)

Clinical Guideline Resources

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)Links to an external site.. (2020). https://www.acog.org/

American Nurses Association (ANA)Links to an external site.. (n.d.). https://www.nursingworld.org/

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC)Links to an external site.. (n.d.). https://www.cdc.gov/

HealthyPeople 2030. (2020). Healthy People 2030 FrameworkLinks to an external site.. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/About-Healthy-People/Development-Healthy-People-2030/Framework

The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP)Links to an external site.. What’s happening at your association. (2020). https://www.aanp.org/

Required Media

Gynecologic Health – Comprehensive Well-Woman Exam

Dr. Phyllis Morgan discusses the comprehensive well-woman exam and any pertinent information related to this topic (27 mins).

SeattlePTC (2015). Examination of Vaginal Wet Preps [Video]Links to an external site.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dgeOPGx6YI&t=3s

Note: This media program is approximately 15 minutes.

Note: As you review this video, consider this as a basic microscopy (yeast, BV).

Optional Resources

Hatcher, R. A., Nelson, A. L., Trussell, J., Cwaik, C., Cason, P., Policar, M. S., Kowal, D. (2018). Contraceptive technology (21st ed.). PDR Network, LLC.

Note: In Weeks 1-10, these resources are optional for your review. In Week 11, you will be required to review each of the PowerPoint slides from the text Gynecologic Health Care (4th ed.).

Chapter 10, “Women’s Health After Bariatric Surgery”Download “Women’s Health After Bariatric Surgery”

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be choose one of the four case study scenarios provided.

Review the Learning Resources for this week and pay close attention to the media program related to the basic microscope skills. Also, consider re-reviewing the media programs found in Week 1 Learning Resources.

Carefully review the clinical guideline resources.

Use the Case Study Template found in the Learning Resources to support the development of your assignment.

By Day 5 of Week 3

Submit your case study assignment by Day 5 of Week 3.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as Wk3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week3_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week3_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzes subjective and objective data and outlines applicable diagnostic tests related to case studies.	30 to >26.7 ptsExcellent The response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriptions of subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions. 26.7 to >23.7 ptsGood The response provides clear, complete partial descriptions of the components of the subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining most of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions. 23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair The response provides some components of the subjective and objective case data, but they are incomplete, vague or inaccurate, outlining some of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions. 20.7 to >0 ptsPoor The response provides unclear or incomplete components of subjective and objective case data. The diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions are missing, incorrect, or inappropriately applied.	30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies differential diagnoses related to case studies.	30 to >26.76 ptsExcellent The response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case. 26.76 to >23.7 ptsGood The response contains at least 2 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case. 23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair The response contains at least 1 differential diagnosis relevant and applicable to the case. 20.7 to >0 ptsPoor The response contains few or no differential diagnoses and/or diagnoses are not relevant and applicable to the case.	30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormulates a treatment plan related to case studies based on scientific rationale, evidence- based standards of care, and practice guidelines. Integrates ethical, psychological, physical, financial issues and Social Determinants of Health in plan.	30 to >26.76 ptsExcellent Formulates a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines. 26.76 to >23.7 ptsGood Formulates a partially complete treatment plan including partial explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines. 23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair Formulates a minimally complete treatment plan including incomplete or vague explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least 2 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines. 20.7 to >0 ptsPoor Formulates a treatment plan that contains incomplete explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options and/ or explanations are missing. Lacks synthesis gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by 1 or no current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.	30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.45 to >0 ptsPoor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 3.45 to >0 ptsPoor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.	5 pts
Total Points: 100

PreviousNext