CAPS 401 Week 2 Search and Evaluate Assignment
CAPS 401 Week 2 Search and Evaluate Assignment
Search and Evaluate
This week, you will find three scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles on your topic. Remember that next week you will submit a paper on Scientific and/or Mathematical/Analytical perspectives of inquiry, so use this week’s assignment to prepare materials and collect information for that purpose.
Use articles that will help you explain and describe scientific issues and/or statistical data or economic information related to your topic. You will analyze and evaluate these articles in your submission, which should include:
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers. We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
A brief introductory paragraph.
Three separate paragraphs, one for each of the three articles, each presenting
A brief 3–4 sentence summary of the article (use in-text citations)
An explanation as to what makes this source credible (in the WCU Library go to Research Guides > Research Basics > Evaluating Resources)
An explanation of why the article will be useful in addressing your problem or issue
A brief conclusory paragraph
An APA Style reference list on a separate page
Your paper should be 1–3 pages in length (including the References page). Adhere to APA Style throughout.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
CAPS 401 Week 2 Search and Evaluate
Healthcare inequality continues to be a critical matter that poses problems for various populations—primarily marginalized groups. Grasping this issue from its scientific and analytical viewpoints is a staple step toward recognizing effective interventions or policy changes. The causes and impact of healthcare disparities and solutions to these issues will be analyzed based on information from three scholarly, peer-reviewed articles. The current review exhibits the credibility, relevance, and statistics available to tackle the problem of healthcare inequality.
Caraballo et al. (2022)
Summary
Caraballo et al. (2022) review how racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic. As the authors of this paper explain, African Americans and Hispanics had higher infection, hospitalization rates, and mortality. This research attributes these disparities to poor pre-pandemic social determinants of health, including suboptimal socio-economic status and access to health care. Furthermore, the study shows systemic factors were at play in widening these gaps during public health crises. Their findings underscore the critical need for targeting interventions to reduce these disparities.
Credibility
This information is credible because it was published in a well-known, peer-reviewed journal reputed globally. According to the Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice (n.d.), this publication strictly reviews articles before issuing them. The authors’ institutional affiliations add to their credibility, for they are very prestigious in their fields. In addition, the study has robust methodologies for statistical analyses with large datasets, which lends further credibility (McSweeney, 2024). Additionally, its findings are reliable and relevant to contemporary discourse on health inequities because the survey is comprehensive.
Usefulness
This highly relevant paper provides insight into the underlying science behind healthcare disparities, especially during this COVID-19 pandemic. Its empirical data helps to support arguments for policy change directed toward reducing inequalities (Nana-Sinkam et al., 2021). Also, this study clarifies how social determinants impact health, and it is essential to investigate how systemic factors influence unequal patterns in health. Likewise, statistical analyses might help build a more integrated picture of the problem from within this document.
Selden & Berdahl (2020)
Summary
Selden & Berdahl (2020) discuss the issue of race, work, and the heightened susceptibility to the COVID-19 risk while focusing on the issue of ethnic disparities in the employment of high-risk occupations. These populations are more inclined to frontline employment, subjecting them to the likelihood of infection. The study also notes that these groups have low healthcare access, increasing their risk of poor health. The authors posit that these factors played a major role in the continued differences in health, which was evident during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Credibility
This source is trustworthy because the author is an expert in health disparities, and the statistics cited in the article come from reputable sources such as the U. S. Census Bureau and the CDC. The fact that the publication is peer-reviewed increases the confidence that other specialists in the field approve the research methodologies and findings (McSweeney, 2024). The authors understood employment patterns and health risks well, which adds more credibility to their conclusions. Consequently, the article provides a coherent and grounded account of the economic aspects of healthcare disparities.
Usefulness
This article helps analyze the economic and occupational dimensions of healthcare disparities. It breaks down employment and health care with statistical data analysis of how they affect different individuals, proving that this is not a case of isolated incidences. The study’s findings will inform further conversations regarding implementing protective measures in the workplace and increasing access to healthcare services for marginalized communities (Nana-Sinkam et al., 2021). Moreover, since the article highlights the economic aspect of health inequality, it will prove useful in policy formulation.
Thakur et al. (2020)
Summary
Thakur et al. (2020) describe the structural and social factors contributing to the racial and ethnic disparities in the COVID-19 disease outbreak in the United States. The article explains how issues like residential segregation, health care gains possession, and these types of educational inequalities have more than an impact on the suppressed class. In their opinion, these rather profound disparities are one of the reasons for increased COVID-19 incidence and lethality in these populations. They have stressed that there are corresponding organized structural problems that need policy solutions to tackle and ultimately help diminish the gap in health.
Credibility
The credibility of this article comes from the fact that this article appeared in a peer-reviewed journal and the heavy reliance on quantitative data from nationally representative health surveys and government reports. There is evidence from the authors’ affiliations with some of the most prestigious learning institutions, which further boosts the credibility of the research (McSweeney, 2024). Analyzing the structural and social determinants of health disparities guarantees that the article offers a balanced point of view on the issue. Based on the methodology employed in the study and the analysis conducted on the data, the study appears to be credible in delivering information on healthcare inequality.
Usefulness
This article can help consider the more extensive structural causes of healthcare disparities. It explains how and why, in the case of illness, determinants like housing and education create inequalities in health. Consequently, the study results will be useful when making policy advocacy cases for integrated policy measures for such causes (Nana-Sinkam et al., 2021). Furthermore, the fact that the article is centered on the future effects of structural racism and its perpetuation in healthcare makes this article very useful in the development of effective long-term strategies toward eradicating unequal healthcare.
Conclusion
The three articles reviewed in this paper give a detailed account of healthcare inequality from scientific, statistical, and economic points of view. They provide important information on various health inequalities, especially concerning coronavirus disease. These sources will be useful in future studies of healthcare inequality’s scientific and analytical elements. In this case, it will be significant to appreciate both theories as they jointly provide a good platform to address this increasingly painstaking and diverse idea of healthcare disparities.
References
Caraballo, C., Ndumele, C. D., Roy, B., Lu, Y., Riley, C., Herrin, J., & Krumholz, H. M. (2022). Trends in racial and ethnic disparities in barriers to timely medical care among adults in the US, 1999 to 2018. JAMA Health Forum, 3(10), e223856. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3856
Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice. (n.d.). Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice | Division of Health Sciences | University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Unlv.edu. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/jhdrp/
McSweeney, K. (2024, August 13). LibGuides: Research basics: Evaluating resources. Guides.westcoastuniversity.edu. https://guides.westcoastuniversity.edu/c.php?g=1100191&p=8023509
Nana-Sinkam, P., Kraschnewski, J., Sacco, R., Chavez, J., Fouad, M., Gal, T., AuYoung, M., Namoos, A., Winn, R., Sheppard, V., Corbie-Smith, G., & Behar-Zusman, V. (2021). Health disparities and equity in the era of COVID-19. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.23
Selden, T. M., & Berdahl, T. A. (2020). COVID-19 and racial/ethnic disparities in health risk, employment, and household composition. Health Affairs, 39(9), 1624–1632. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00897
Thakur, N., Lovinsky-Desir, S., Bime, C., Wisnivesky, J. P., & Celedón, J. C. (2020). The structural and social determinants of the racial/ethnic disparities in the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic: What’s our role? American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 202(7). https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202005-1523pp