Discussion: Leaders and Systems-Based Practice (Graded)

Discussion: Leaders and Systems-Based Practice (Graded)

Discussion: Leaders and Systems-Based Practice (Graded)

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for learners to discuss how they will use systems-based practice to grow in the role of nursing leader.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Plan leadership strategies within systems-based practice. (PO 2)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion

Leaders use systems-based practice to empower other nurses. Considering your current or former clinical setting, share how you will use principles of systems-based practice to grow in your role as a leader in nursing. Include a scholarly outside source to support your answer.

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts
16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.
12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Total Points: 50

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Leaders and System-Based Practice

Leadership is critical to organizational growth and empowerment of nurses to enable them handle complex health issues competently. Growth as a leader in nursing requires improved awareness of practice issues, a desire to implement emerging, problem-centered work approaches, and a desire to enable various components to work together for improved patient outcomes. Central to this growth is the systems-based approach that leaders and staff should embrace for high-performance and outcome-driven relationships at all levels. The system-based approach is characterized by actions that depict knowledge of the larger healthcare context and system, effective responsiveness, and capacity to call on system resources to optimize value (Castillo et al., 2020; Guralnick et al., 2021). Therefore, it is an approach centered on maximizing output with a broadened focus on issues.

Leaders can enhance their growth by using the principles of system-based practice in multiple ways. At a personal level, interprofessional collaboration should be highly promoted to deliver the best outcomes for the clinical setting and patients. In the dynamic, complex health practice, interprofessional collaboration brings together a team with diverse skills, values, and perspectives to address a shared problem (McLaney et al., 2022). This fosters a spirit of teamwork, and nurse leaders can improve their delegation, organizational, and problem-solving skills when implementing team-based approaches. The other approach is implementing work models to streamline processes and structures. Process streamlining is essential in quality improvement and aligns with the principles of systems-based practice since its objective is to optimize resource utilization (Masters, 2021). It shows awareness of interconnections between various healthcare components since preventing resource wastage saves organizational financial and material resources. Above all, it fosters healthy relationships between the management and departments as leaders optimize value to achieve the broader organization’s vision.

References

Castillo, E. G., Isom, J., DeBonis, K. L., Jordan, A., Braslow, J. T., & Rohrbaugh, R. (2020). Reconsidering systems-based practice: advancing structural competency, health equity, and social responsibility in graduate medical education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 95(12), 1817–1822. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003559

Guralnick, S., Fondahn, E., Amin, A., & Bittner, E. A. (2021). Systems-based practice: time to finally adopt the orphan competency. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 13(2 Suppl), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00839.1

Masters, K. (2021). Role development in professional nursing practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

McLaney, E., Morassaei, S., Hughes, L., Davies, R., Campbell, M., & Di Prospero, L. (2022). A framework for interprofessional team collaboration in a hospital setting: Advancing team competencies and behaviours. Healthcare Management Forum, 35(2), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704211063584