Discussion: NURS 6003 Week 5 Strategies for Academic Portfolios 

Discussion: NURS 6003 Week 5 Strategies for Academic Portfolios

NURS 6003 Week 5 Discussion: Strategies for Academic Portfolios

NURS 6003 Discussion: Strategies for Academic Portfolios

When assembling a portfolio, professionals in different fields should focus on elements that demonstrate academic achievements. This might include course syllabi, exams and/or papers they have written, letters of recommendation from professors or employers, and any other awards or scholarships that may have been received. There is also the need to incorporate a strong GPA or other notable accomplishments which should be prominently included in the portfolio (Burns, 2018). One strategy for including academic activities and accomplishments into my professional development goals is to frame them in terms of the skills they demonstrate. For example, when publishing an article on a new methodology developed, I could frame that as an evidence of my expertise in methodological innovation. Another strategy is to highlight how the experience has shaped my thinking or practice.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Additionally, in case of little professional experience, I will think of ways to highlight my skills and abilities. This might include volunteering or interning in relevant positions, writing an article or blog post on a topic related to my field of study, or participating in online discussions related to the area of interest (Cusack & Smith, 2020). Walden University emphasizes on social change through the development of transferable skills, this is perceived as a great way to show how the academic work has prepared different students for the job purposes.
Walden University emphasizes also emphasizes on the development of professional experience through engagement in diverse academic activities. One way that Walden helps students develop professional experience is by requiring them to complete a capstone project (Walden University, n.d). In this project, students work with a real-world client to apply the knowledge and skills they have learned in their program of study. This gives students the opportunity to work on a real project, with real deadlines, and under the supervision of a professor who is an expert in the field.
Another way that Walden helps students gain professional experience is by providing opportunities for students to engage in research (Walden University, n.d). For example, Walden offers undergraduate and graduate students the opportunity to participate in its annual Research Week conference. These activities align with my academic activities and accomplishments into professional development goals.

References
Burns, M. K. (2018). Creating a nursing portfolio. Ohio Nurses Review, 93(3), 16-17. 10.1097/01.NND.0000277181.24959.3b.
Cusack, L., & Smith, M. (2020). Portfolios for Nursing, Midwifery and other Health Professions, E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Walden University. (n.d.). Field experience: College of Nursing: Student resources – Graduate courses.https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son/applicationprocess?preview=628dc4af1964e1228ef523827b9733ab#s-lg-box-3870501

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Discussion: Strategies for Academic Portfolios
In the realm of marketing, a successful branding strategy is one of the most important contributors to organizational success. A solid branding strategy can help add visibility and credibility to a company’s products.
Week 5: Professional Development Plan

Accessible player

Accessible player
Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Blueprint to Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Your Professional Development Plan [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze strategies for including academic activities and accomplishments into professional portfolios (D)
Develop professional development goals (A)
Align professional development goals to Walden’s social change initiatives (A)
Identify concepts and requirements for the MSN Practicum (Q)
Due By
Assignment
Week 5, Days 1–2
Read the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 5, Day 3
Deadline to post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to check your knowledge with the Quiz.
Week 5, Days 4–5
Compose your peer Discussion responses. (Make sure to participate in the Discussion on three different days.)
Continue to check your knowledge with the Quiz.
Week 5, Day 6
Last day to post Discussion responses.
Week 5, Day 7 Final day to complete the Quiz.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Burns, M. K. (2018). Creating a nursing portfolio. Ohio Nurses Review, 93(3), 16-17.

Casey, D. & Egan, D. (2013). The use of professional portfolios for career enhancement. British Journal of Nursing, 15(11), 547–552.

East, R. (2015). Developing a nurse practitioner portfolio. ACORN: The Journal of Perioperative Nursing in Australia, 28(4), 35.

Hannans, J. & Olivo, Y. (2017). Craft a positive nursing digital identity with an ePortfolio. American Nurse Today, 12(11), 48–49 https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ant11-Digital-Identity-1017a-1.pdf

Leahy, R., & Filiatrault, A. (2017). Employers’ perceptions of the benefits of employment electronic portfolios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(2), 217-223.

McMillan, L. R., Parker, F., & Sport, A. (2014). Decisions, decisions! E-portfolio as an effective hiring assessment tool. Nursing Management, 45(4), 52-54.

Walden University. (n.d.). Walden University catalog. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://catalog.waldenu.edu

Select College of Health Professions, then Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Review the MSN Learning Outcomes on this page.

Walden University. (n.d.). Field experience: College of Nursing: Student resources – Graduate courses. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son/applicationprocess?preview=628dc4af1964e1228ef523827b9733ab#s-lg-box-3870501

Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Walden templates: Overview. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates

NOTE: Download and review the College of Nursing template by navigating to “Program-Specific Templates,” “College of Nursing,” and selecting “College of Nursing Writing Template With Instructions.”

Document: APA Basics Checklist: Citations, Reference List, and Style (PDF)

Required Media
Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2018). Scholars of Change: Reis Woolen [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Accessible player
Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2018). Scholars of Change: Jackie Kundert [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Accessible player
Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2018). Scholars of Change: Joan Kempagno [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Accessible player

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6002_Week_5_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6002_Week_5_Discussion_Rubric

Similarly, nurse-scholars can build a personal brand to add visibility and credibility to their work. You can begin building your brand by developing and maintaining an academic portfolio. Such an activity can help share the results of your efforts and contribute to your success. This Week’s Discussion asks you to consider and share strategies for building your portfolio.

Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.

To Prepare:

Reflect on strategies that you can pursue in developing portfolios or portfolio elements that focus on academic achievements.
Review one or more samples from your own research of resources focused on portfolio development.
By Day 3
Post an explanation of at least two strategies for including academic activities and accomplishments into your professional development goals. Then, explain how those goals may align with the University’s emphasis on social change. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering additional ideas regarding academic achievements to include or offering alternative ways of presenting the current achievements.

Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 5 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6
To participate in this Discussion:

Week 5 Discussion