Discussion: Role Of The Nurse In Healthcare Programs Capstone
Discussion: Role Of The Nurse In Healthcare Programs Capstone
Question Description
Need help with my Nursing question – I’m studying for my class.
Program Design
In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions.
· Tell us about a healthcare program within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?
· Who is your target population?
· What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?
· What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?
· What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?
Points Range:41 (41.00%) – 45 (45.00%)
Response provides a clear and complete summary of the healthcare program, including an accurate and detailed description of the costs and projected outcomes of the program.
Response provides a clear and accurate description that fully describes the target population.
Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including specific examples.
Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected.
Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions as well as fully explaining impacts to program design.
Points Range:36 (36.00%) – 40 (40.00%)
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program, including a description of the costs and project outcomes of the program.
Response provides an accurate description of the target population.
Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including some examples.
Response provides an accurate description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected.
Response provides an accurate explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and somewhat explains impacts to program design.
Points Range:31 (31.00%) – 35 (35.00%)
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague or incomplete or does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program.
Description of the target population is vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program is vague, inaccurate, or does not include specific examples.
Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague or inaccurate.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 30 (30.00%)
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague and inaccurate, does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program, or is missing.
Description of the target population is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, and specific examples is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Program Implementation
· What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?
· Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why you think this?
Points Range:36 (36.00%) – 40 (40.00%)
Response provides a clear, accurate, and complete explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation.
Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, including specific examples.
Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.
The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.
Points Range:32 (32.00%) – 35 (35.00%)
Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation.
Response provides an accurate explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, and may include some specific examples.
Response provides and accurate description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.
The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the summary provided.
Points Range:28 (28.00%) – 31 (31.00%)
Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete.
Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague or inaccurate and/or does not include specific examples.
Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is inaccurate or incomplete.
The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 27 (27.00%)
Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.
The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Name:NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.