NR 603 Week 2 Discussion: Mental Health Case Study

NR 603 Week 2 Discussion: Mental Health Case Study

NR 603 Week 2 Discussion: Mental Health Case Study

Mental Health Case Study

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising scholarly literature. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.?This discussion will support the professional formation of the nurse practitioner role.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Interpret subjective and objective data to develop appropriate diagnoses and evidence-based management plans for patients and families with complex or multiple diagnoses across the lifespan. (PO 5)?

CO 4: Develop management plans based on current scientific evidence and national guidelines. (PO 5)?

CO 6: Prioritize treatment based on relevant clinical presentation. (PO 5)

Due Date

Initial posts are due to the discussion board by?Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Follow-up peer questions are due by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. MT, and the final diagnosis is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline?Tuesday?at 11:59 p.m. MT,?regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59?p.m.?MT on Sunday (i.e.,?the?student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible

This is discussion is worth a total of 80 points.

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Include the Following Sections:

Application?of?Course?Knowledge: Use the mental health disorder assigned to you by your course faculty (via email) and create a case study for a primary care client. You may use a client seen in practicum as the basis for the case study or you may create a case after researching your assigned disorder. In your initial post, address each of the following components using your own words:

Subjective data: chief complaint, history of present illness, demographic data, risk factors, previous medical, surgical, and psychiatric history

Objective data: Physical exam findings and mental status exam

Recommended diagnostic tests

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue

Responding to a Peer’s Case:?Respond to at least one other student’s initial case presentation and include the following:

Based on the initial case presentation, list your top three differential diagnoses.

Choose the most likely diagnosis.

Support your decision with scholarly sources that represent a logical link between the case study and article information. Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site..

Respond to a peer who does not already have a peer response in the discussion.

Leading the Discussion/Final Diagnosis: Respond?to peers and course faculty to further dialogue:

Present the actual diagnosis for your case study. Provide appropriate management options for the diagnosis.

Use the most current clinical practice guidelines to support your management plan.

Respond to all students who engage with your case study. Discuss how the peer’s differential diagnoses do or do not fit with the case as presented.

Respond to all faculty questions.

Professionalism in Communication:?Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.?

Present?information in?a?logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence?that?is relevant to the discussion topic.

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to?be limited?to one short quotation (not to exceed 10 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion.

Reference Citation:?Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.?

Tuesday Participation Requirement: Provide?a?substantive?response to the graded?discussion?topic (not?a?response?to a peer or faculty),?by?Tuesday,?11:59 p.m. MT?of?each week.?

Total Participation Requirement:?Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student?peer,?and one to a faculty question)?on two different days during the week.??

**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion forum title and then Show Rubric.?

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

NR603_W2 Mental Health Case Study Discussion

NR603_W2 Mental Health Case Study Discussion
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Knowledge

3 Required Criteria

Using the mental health disorder assigned to you by your course faculty (via email or announcement), create a case study for a primary care client. In your initial post, address each of the following components using your own words:

1. Subjective data: chief complaint, history of present illness, demographic data, risk factors, previous medical, surgical, and psychiatric history

2. Objective data: Physical exam findings and mental status exam

3. Recommended diagnostic tests

35 pts

Excellent

All requirements are met.

29 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements are met.

18 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement is met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.

35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialouge

4 Required Criteria

Respond to at least one peer’s initial case presentation and include the following:

1. Based on the initial case presentation, list your top three differential diagnoses.

2. Choose the most likely diagnosis.

3. Support your decision with scholarly sources that represent a logical link between the case study and article information. Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations.

4. Respond to a peer who does not already have a peer response in the discussion.
20 pts

Excellent

All?requirements are met.

18 pts

Very Good

3 requirements are met.

16 pts

Satisfactory

2 ?requirements are met.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

1?requirement is met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No?requirements are met.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeading the Discussion/Final Diagnosis

4 Required Criteria

Respond?to peers and course faculty to further dialogue:

1. Present the actual diagnosis for your case study. Provide appropriate management options for the diagnosis.

2. Use the most current clinical practice guidelines to support your management plan.

3. Respond to all students who engage with your case study. Discuss how the peer’s differential diagnoses do or do not fit with the case as presented.

4. Respond to all faculty questions
17 pts

Excellent

All requirements are met.

15 pts

Very Good

3 requirements are met.

14 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements are met.

9 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement is met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.

17 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism in Communication

Communicates with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
4 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

3.5 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Citation

Uses current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

4 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

3.5 pts

Very Good

2 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

3-4 errors.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

5-6 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 6 errors.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Sunday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).
0 pts

No Points Deducted

Enters first post by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; enters peer/faculty responses by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

0 pts

Points Deducted

10% (8 points deducted from the assignment total of 80) deducted per day for late submission.
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTotal Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).
0 pts

No Points Deducted

Required number of posts is met. No points will be deducted.

0 pts

Points Deducted

Required number of posts not met. A 10% (8 points deducted from the assignment total of 80) penalty will be applied.
0 pts

Total Points: 80