NRNP 6665 Week 9 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

NRNP 6665 Week 9 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

NRNP 6665 Week 9 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

The DSM-5-TR is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the DSM-5-TR, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Week 9: Learning Resources

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Boland, R. Verdiun, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Chapter 11, “Dissociative Disorders”

Required Media

Osmosis. (2017, November 20). Dissociative disorders – causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, pathology

Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/XF2zeOdE5GYLinks to an external site.

Mad Medicine. (2019, August 18). Dissociative disorders (Psychiatry) – USMLE Step 1

Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Iz03M9pwhs0Links to an external site.

Grande, T. (2018, October 22). The dissociative identity disorder controversy (Trauma vs. Iatrogenic)

Links to an external site.. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqTP0CP9aDk

To Prepare

Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

By Day 7 of Week 9

Submit your Assignment

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome • Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome • Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors
5 pts

Total Points: 100