NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment 2 Study Plan

he study plan that you developed in NRNP 6665, and revise your plan as necessary, which will serve as the road map for you to follow to attain your certification.
To Prepare
Reflect on the study plan you created in NRNP 6665. Did you accomplish your SMART goals? What areas of focus still present opportunities for growth?
The Assignment
Revise your study plan summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.
Develop 3–4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.
Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.
By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your study plan.

Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 2 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 2 Assignment 2 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 2 Assignment 2 Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 2 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2
To participate in this Assignment:

Week 2 Assignment 2

What’s Coming Up in Module 2?

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

In Module 2, you will practice assessing, diagnosing, and formulating treatment plans for various mental health disorders across the lifespan. You will also explore controversies and treatment issues related to certain disorders. Disorders not covered in NRNP 6665 will be covered in this course. You will complete your midterm exam in Week 6.
Name: NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent

90%–100% Good

80%–89% Fair

70%–79% Poor

0%–69%
Revise your study plan, summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response provides an accurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
A summary of both the current strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing.
Develop 3-4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response provides 3-4 new clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured.
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response provides 3-4 new appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response provides 3-4 somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate.
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response provides 3-4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing.
Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need.
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need.
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time.

Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains 1-2 APA format errors
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3-4 APA format errors
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains five or more APA format errors
Total Points: 100
Name: NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_Rubric