NRS 430 Assignment: CLC-Nursing Theory and Conceptual Model Presentation

NRS 430 Assignment: CLC-Nursing Theory and Conceptual Model Presentation

NRS 430 Assignment: CLC-Nursing Theory and Conceptual Model Presentation

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

This assignment is to be completed in a group, which will be assigned by your instructor. The presentation will be submitted and graded as a group assignment.

Nursing theories are tested and systematic ways to implement nursing practice. Select a nursing theory and its conceptual model. Prepare a 15-18-slide PowerPoint in which you describe the nursing theory and its conceptual model and demonstrate its application in nursing practice. Include the following:

Present an overview of the nursing theory. Describe which conceptual model the theory would fall into. Is it a practice theory, midrange theory, or grand theory? Justify your response with evidence.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Explain how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts.

Describe how this nursing theory is applied or integrated using examples of three evidence-based practices.

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

CLC – Nursing Theory and Conceptual Model Presentation – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total150 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Nursing Theory and Conceptual Model

Nursing Theory and Conceptual Model

0 points

An overview of the nursing theory is not provided. An explanation for which conceptual model the theory would fall into (practice theory, midrange theory, or grand theory) is not provided.
22.5 points

An overview of the nursing theory is unclear and lacks specific details. An explanation of which conceptual model the theory would fall into (practice theory, midrange theory, or grand theory) is incomplete. Justification is unclear and evidence is incomplete.

23.7 points

A basic overview of the nursing theory is presented. A general explanation of which conceptual model the theory would fall into (practice theory, midrange theory, or grand theory) is presented. Justification is present with evidence.
26.7 points

A clear overview of the nursing theory is presented. A thorough explanation of which conceptual model the theory would fall into (practice theory, midrange theory, or grand theory) is presented. Justification is clear and includes relevant and thoughtful evidence.

30 points

A comprehensive, detailed, and accurate overview of the nursing theory is presented. A comprehensive, accurate, and well thought out explanation of which conceptual model the theory would fall into (practice theory, midrange theory, or grand theory) is presented. Justification is well thought out and includes accurate and detailed evidence.

Incorporation of Four Metaparadigm Concepts Into Nursing Theory

Incorporation of Four Metaparadigm Concepts Into Nursing Theory

0 points

An explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is not provided.

22.5 points

An explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is unclear and contains inaccuracies.

23.7 points

A basic explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is included.

26.7 points

A clear explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is included.
30 points

A comprehensive and accurate explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is included.

Description of Nursing Theory Application and Evidence-Based Practice

Description of Nursing Theory Application and Evidence-Based Practice
0 points

A description of how the nursing theory is applied or integrated is not provided and there are no examples.

22.5 points

A description of how the nursing theory is applied or integrated is unclear and the examples of the evidence-based practices are incomplete.
23.7 points

A basic description of how the nursing theory is applied or integrated is provided and general examples of three evidence-based practices are included.
26.7 points

A clear description of how the nursing theory is applied or integrated is provided and examples of three relevant evidence-based practices are included.
30 points

A comprehensive, detailed, and accurate description of how the nursing theory is applied or integrated is provided and examples of three relevant and sound evidence-based practices are included.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
11.25 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.
11.85 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

13.35 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
15 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Layout

Layout
0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
11.25 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

11.85 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
13.35 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
15 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
11.25 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

11.85 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

13.35 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
15 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. .
5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
5.93 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
6.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

7.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. .
5.63 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
5.93 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
6.68 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
7.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.