NRS 433V Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
https://nursingassinmentshelp.com
Research Critique Guidelines – Part I
Nurse burnout was the issue with nursing practice that was identified in topic one. Because of its detrimental consequences on the delivery of patient care, the quality of that treatment, and the welfare of nurses, nursing burnout is a significant problem for the healthcare system. Article I by Elkady (2019), “Mindfulness and Resilience as Predictors of Job Burnout Among Nurses in Public Hospitals,” and Article II by Diehl et al., “The Relationship Between Workload and Burnout Among Nurses: The Buffering Role of Personal, Social, and Organizational Resources,” are the two quantitative studies taken into consideration in topic one (2021). In accordance with article I, resilience and mindfulness are crucial interventions that can aid nurses in preventing burnout and improving their general performance. Nurse burnout, which continues to have an impact on the delivery of high-quality healthcare in various healthcare institutions, is the main issue mentioned in the article. The study’s goal was to find out how resilience and mindfulness affected nurse burnout. The study also looks into how these two phenomena affect nurses’ job burnout in public health facilities. The study’s main goal was to identify efficient ways to control nurse burnout in order to guarantee high-quality healthcare delivery. What is the effect of mindfulness and resilience on nurse burnout? is the main research question. The significance of the article for nursing can be attributed to the various interventions it demonstrates that nurses can use to reduce burnout and handle stress.
In accordance with Article II, nurses can avoid burnout through efficient interventions based on social, individual, and organizational resources. The article offers interventions to deal with nurse burnout in palliative care settings, which makes it important for nursing practice. Nurse burnout, which still has an impact on the provision of high-quality healthcare services, is the main issue covered in this article. The study’s goal was to investigate the protective impact of resources on the relationship between workload and burnout. The article’s main goal is to demonstrate how nurse burnout can hinder the provision of high-quality medical care. What is the relationship between nurse workload and burnout, and what function do personal, social, and organizational resources play in safeguarding these healthcare professionals? The two articles are important to nursing since they offer several methods for preventing nurse burnout and ensuring high-quality healthcare delivery.
Qualitative Studies
Background of Study
There are different research methodologies that can be utilized in the research processes. There are both qualitative and quantitative research processes. Qualitative research involves the collection and analysis of non-numerical data such as texts, videos, or audio documents in order to understand concepts, experiences, and opinions. Qualitative research processes can also be utilized to gather in-depth insights into the problem and generate unique or new ideas for the research process.
Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research which often involves the collection, and the analysis of the numerical data. The qualitative study I, “Qualitative study of telemonitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes” by Hanley et al., (2015) involves an investigation of the experiences of professionals and patients taking part in the randomized controlled trials of blood pressure, blood glucose, and weight.
The problem under consideration is type 2 diabetes. The article is significant to nursing because it entails different approaches geared towards enhancing evidence-based practices. The purpose of the article is to determine the best interventions for the patients suffering from type 2 diabetes. One of the research question is: Does telemonitoring of blood glucose, blood pressure and weight in primary care a promising approach of improving diabetes management?
The qualitative article II considered is: “Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association” by Colberg et al. (2016). The main objective of the article is to determine the impacts of physical activity/exercise on the management of diabetes.
The article is significant to nursing since it involves consideration of different nursing approaches or interventions when it come to the management of diseases. The purpose of the article is to determine the best interventions that can be applied in the management of type 2 diabetes (Colberg et al., 2016). The objective of the research article II is to determine the best interventions for the individuals suffering from type 2 diabetes. The article focuses on the physical activity as the best approach when it comes to the management of type 2 diabetes.
From the research article, the American Diabetes association recommend physical activities/exercise in the management of type 2 diabetes. There are different other interventions mentioned in the article; however, the focus is on the physical activities. The main research question in the article is: does the physical activity/exercise aids in the reduction of type 2 diabetes? The question covers all the aspect of the paper. In other words, it reflects the research objectives, the purpose of the research and literature review.
How the Two Articles Support the Nurse Practice Issue Chosen
These articles provide helpful information that can be applied in answering the PICOT question on diabetes. The issue is type 2 diabetes. From the research articles, there are literature reviews consisting of advanced information required in the understanding of the topic and the main issues surrounding the PICOT question.
Article I elaborates on the effective interventions that can be undertaken to reduce type 2 diabetes. Also, with the established outcomes from the research processes, the two articles provide elaborate and conclusive information that can be used to answer or address different aspects of the PICOT question. Article II elaborates on the physical activities or the exercise as one of the main practice of reducing type 2 diabetes.
The research question is well elaborated and it provides a conclusive information about the importance of physical activities on reducing type 2 diabetes. This can therefore be applied in the development of interventions required in the management of type 2 diabetes.
Some of the physical activities movement that enhances the use of energy. Structured physical activities are always required to ensure effective outcomes (Hanley et al., 2015). Physical exercise often improves glucose control when it comes to the management of type 2 diabetes. Also, physical activities reduce cardiovascular risks which are also associated with the management of type 2 diabetes. Regular physical exercise can stop or delay type 2 diabetes.
How the Interventions and Comparison Groups in the Articles Compare
To Those Identified in Your PICOT Question
The interventions and comparison groups from the two articles are comparable to the ones that have been identified in the PICOT statement. There is a high similarity between the comparison and the intervention groups in all the two articles identified for the study. The PICOT question is about type 2 diabetes or the best interventions required in the management of type two diabetes. The comparison in the groups in the two research articles serves as a source of counterfactual causal inference. The goal of the comparison group in the research articles and the ones in the PICOT question is to estimate the effects of treatment.
Order An Original Paper From Us
Method of Study
The two qualitative articles adhere to the qualitative approach. However, study II incorporates observational approaches to the institute findings on the basis of the objectives and the research questions. On the other hand, the qualitative study I applies survey techniques to establish significant findings. One of the benefits of the observational method of the qualitative research is that it is simpler and easier to use. The disadvantage of the method is that there is always lack of in-depth analysis leading to the lack of comprehensive outcomes.
Results of Study
The qualitative study II concludes that physical activities/ exercise reduce the cases of type 2 diabetes. In other words, physical exercise is one of the best interventions in the management of type 2 diabetes. From the information obtained from different sources, qualitative research article II concludes that the adoption and maintenance of physical activities are essential for the blood glucose management and overall health among the individuals suffering from type 2 diabetes (Latimer et al., 2017). The recommendations and precautions vary depending on individual characteristics and health status.
The two qualitative studies have different implications in the nursing practice. The studies facilitate the acquisition of knowledge and practical skills when it comes to the management of type 2 diabetes. In other words, the two studies provide new knowledge in the nursing practices and the understanding of the steps that ought to be undertaken to reduce health complications associated with type 2 diabetes.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations are significant in the research processes. From the two qualitative research articles, there is the portrayal of confidentiality and respect for human dignity. These are some of the ethical considerations that have been applied in the two research articles. Before engaging in a research process, the acquisition of consent from the respondents is always necessary.
Also, there is always the need to keep patients’ information safe so as to avoid the loss of important information. When undertaking the above qualitative studies, researchers adhered to the confidentiality of information which is considered to be one of the major ethical concerns. Also, they managed to do their studies in line with the requirements that protect human dignity, especially for the study participants.
Order An Original Paper From Us
References
Colberg, S. R., Sigal, R. J., Yardley, J. E., Riddell, M. C., Dunstan, D. W., Dempsey, P. C., … & Tate, D. F. (2016). Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes care, 39(11), 2065-2079. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1728
Hanley, J., Fairbrother, P., McCloughan, L., Pagliari, C., Paterson, M., Pinnock, H., … & McKinstry, B. (2015). Qualitative study of telemonitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes. BMJ open, 5(12). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008896
Latimer, S., Hewitt, J., Stanbrough, R., & McAndrew, R. (2017). Reducing medication errors: Teaching strategies that increase nursing students’ awareness of medication errors and their prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.02.004
Assessment Description
Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.
Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.
In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Attachments
NRS-433V-RS2-ResearchCritiqueGuideline
Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.
Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment. Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. according to NRS 433V Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations, an abstract is not required. Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
NRS 433V Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-433V NRS-433V-O501 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 190.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) 4: Good (94.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 75.0%
Qualitative Studies 5.0% Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research. N/A N/A Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 433V Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Criteria Description
Qualitative Studies
5. 5: Excellent
9.5 points
Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.89 points
N/A
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.13 points
Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.
Background of Study
Criteria Description
Background of Study
5. 5: Excellent
19 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.77 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
14.25 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.
Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue
Criteria Description
Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue
5. 5: Excellent
28.5 points
A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.
A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
23.65 points
A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
21.38 points
A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.
Method of Study
Criteria Description
Method of Study
5. 5: Excellent
28.5 points
A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.
A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity.
3. 3: Satisfactory
23.65 points
A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
21.38 points
A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.
Results of Study
Criteria Description
Results of Study
5. 5: Excellent
28.5 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
23.65 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
21.38 points
A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.
Ethical Considerations
Criteria Description
Ethical Considerations
5. 5: Excellent
28.5 points
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented.
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity.
3. 3: Satisfactory
23.65 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
21.38 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
9.5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.89 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.13 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
9.5 points
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.89 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.13 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
9.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.89 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.13 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. 5: Excellent
9.5 points
All format elements are correct.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.89 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.13 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent
9.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.89 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.13 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Total 190 points
|
Criterion
|
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
|
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
|
3. 3: Satisfactory
|
4. 4: Good
|
5. 5: Excellent
|
|
Ethical Considerations
Ethical Considerations
|
0 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete.
|
21.38 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions.
|
23.65 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed.
|
26.79 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity.
|
28.5 points
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented.
|
|
Results of Study
Results of Study
|
0 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.
|
21.38 points
A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.
|
23.65 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.
|
26.79 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
|
28.5 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
|
|
Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue
Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue
|
0 points
Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.
|
21.38 points
A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required.
|
23.65 points
A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed.
|
26.79 points
A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support.
|
28.5 points
A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.
|
|
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
|
7.13 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
|
7.89 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
8.93 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
9.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
Thesis Development and Purpose
Thesis Development and Purpose
|
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
7.13 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
|
7.89 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
8.93 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
9.5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
0 points
Sources are not documented.
|
7.13 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
7.89 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
8.93 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
9.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
|
Qualitative Studies
Qualitative Studies
|
0 points
Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.
|
7.13 points
Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.
|
7.89 points
N/A
|
8.93 points
N/A
|
9.5 points
Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.
|
|
Argument Logic and Construction
Argument Logic and Construction
|
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
7.13 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
7.89 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
8.93 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
9.5 points
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
Method of Study
Method of Study
|
0 points
Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.
|
21.38 points
A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
|
23.65 points
A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed.
|
26.79 points
A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity.
|
28.5 points
A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.
|
|
Background of Study
Background of Study
|
0 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.
|
14.25 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
|
15.77 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
|
17.86 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
|
19 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
|
|
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
7.13 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
7.89 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
8.93 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
9.5 points
All format elements are correct.
|
