NUR 621 Topic 2 Assignment: Economics and Quality

NUR 621 Topic 2 Assignment: Economics and Quality

NUR 621 Topic 2 Assignment: Economics and Quality

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to address health care issues facing the United States in terms of economics and quality. Choose one of the following topics (suicide rates, chronic disease, obesity, health care disparities, or missed care) and write a 1,250- to 1,500-word paper addressing the following:

Explain why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.

Discuss the impact that health care economics has on your topic.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Discuss what you could do as a nurse leader to make an impact on your chosen issue in your professional setting.

Analyze the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.

Describe what impact you can have on health policy as a nurse leader.

Include 3–4 peer-reviewed resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Economics and Quality – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total100 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Significant Health Care Issue

Significant Health Care Issue

0 points

Does not explain why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.

12 points

Unclearly explains why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
13.2 points

Partially explains why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
13.8 points

Clearly explains why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.
15 points

Compellingly explains why it is a significant health care issue in the United States.

Impact of Health Care Economics

0 points

Does not discuss the impact that health care economics has on the topic.

16 points

Poorly discusses the impact that health care economics has on the topic.
17.6 points

Somewhat discusses the impact that health care economics has on the topic.
18.4 points

Succinctly discusses the impact that health care economics has on the topic.

20 points

Professionally discusses the impact that health care economics has on the topic.

Making an Impact

Making an Impact

0 points

Does not discuss what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.
12 points

Inappropriately discusses what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.

13.2 points

Broadly discusses what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.

13.8 points

Appropriately discusses what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.

15 points

Insightfully discusses what could be done as a nurse leader to make an impact on the chosen issue in the professional setting.

The Impact of Quality Measures on Reimbursement

The Impact of Quality Measures on Reimbursement

0 points

Does not analyze the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.

16 points

Incorrectly analyzes the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.
17.6 points

Ambiguously analyzes the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.

18.4 points

Correctly analyzes the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.

20 points

Thoroughly analyzes the impact of quality measures on reimbursement.

Impact as a Nurse Leader

Impact as a Nurse Leader

0 points

Does not describe the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.
12 points

Unrealistically describes the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.
13.2 points

Briefly describes the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.

13.8 points

Accurately describes the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.
15 points

Realistically describes the impact on health policy as a nurse leader.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

4 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

4.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
4.4 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
4.6 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

4 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

4.6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, with only minor errors.

5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.