NUR 630 Assignment: Visual Model

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to differentiate quality improvement (QI), evidence-based practice (EBP), and research.

Create a graphic image or visual model differentiating quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. You can use PowerPoint, Smart Art in Word, or other software that creates a graphic. Be creative in your design. Include the following information in your graphic image or visual model:

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Compare and contrast quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. Identify at least one similarity and difference for each.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NUR 630 Assignment: Visual Model

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Provide an example of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.

Explain why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting.

This assignment requires a minimum of two peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

visual Model – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total80 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Insufficient	3. Approaching	4. Acceptable	5. Target
Compare and Contrast Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research Compare and Contrast Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research	0 points Visual model does not compare and contrast quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.	6.4 points Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	7.04 points Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.	7.36 points Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research and is detailed.	8 points Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research and is thorough.
Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research	0 points Examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are not present.	6.4 points Less than three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present.	7.04 points Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present.	7.36 points Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. Most examples are appropriate.	8 points Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. All examples are appropriate.
Application of Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research Application of Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research	0 points A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is not present.	6.4 points A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present, but lacks details or is incomplete.	7.04 points A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present.	7.36 points A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present and detailed.	8 points A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present and thorough.
Scholarly Sources Scholarly Sources	0 points Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present.	6.4 points One or two sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present.	7.04 points A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present.	7.36 points A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.	8 points A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Technical Requirements: Graphics Technical Requirements: Graphics	0 points No graphics are used in the visual model.	19.2 points Graphics are used in the visual model, but they are distracting.	21.12 points Graphics are used in the visual model.	22.08 points Graphics are used in the visual model and visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.	24 points Graphics are used in the visual model and visual connections contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.
Aesthetic Quality Aesthetic Quality	0 points Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.	4.48 points Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.	4.93 points Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.	5.15 points Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.	5.6 points Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.
Appropriateness Appropriateness	0 points There is no evidence that the student has selected an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Materials (photo, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) are missing.	4.48 points Student selection of a tool, technique, or paradigm does not relate to the project or course goal. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are not appropriate for the audience and the situation and are inadequately developed.	4.93 points Student selects a tool, technique, or paradigm that achieves a basic representation as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation but some of the development of the material is inadequate.	5.15 points Student selects an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the desired goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation.	5.6 points Student shows a deep understanding of the audience and the situation by selecting material that enhances understanding. Student creates tools, techniques, or paradigms that effectively achieve the desired goal.
Synthesis Synthesis	0 points Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable.	3.84 points Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.	4.22 points Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.	4.42 points Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.	4.8 points Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)	0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.	3.2 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.	3.52 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.	3.68 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.	4 points No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,	0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.	3.2 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.	3.52 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.	3.68 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.	4 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Compare and Contrast Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

0 points

Visual model does not compare and contrast quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.

6.4 points

Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

7.04 points

Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.

7.36 points

Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research and is detailed.

8 points

Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research and is thorough.

Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

0 points

Examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are not present.

6.4 points

Less than three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present.

7.04 points

Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present.

7.36 points

Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. Most examples are appropriate.

8 points

Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. All examples are appropriate.

Application of Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

0 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is not present.

6.4 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present, but lacks details or is incomplete.

7.04 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present.

7.36 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present and detailed.

8 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present and thorough.

Scholarly Sources

0 points

Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present.

6.4 points

One or two sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present.

7.04 points

A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present.

7.36 points

A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

8 points

A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

Technical Requirements: Graphics

0 points

No graphics are used in the visual model.

19.2 points

Graphics are used in the visual model, but they are distracting.

21.12 points

Graphics are used in the visual model.

22.08 points

Graphics are used in the visual model and visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

24 points

Graphics are used in the visual model and visual connections contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

Aesthetic Quality

0 points

Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.

4.48 points

Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.

4.93 points

Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.

5.15 points

Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.

5.6 points

Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.

Appropriateness

0 points

There is no evidence that the student has selected an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Materials (photo, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) are missing.

4.48 points

Student selection of a tool, technique, or paradigm does not relate to the project or course goal. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are not appropriate for the audience and the situation and are inadequately developed.

4.93 points

Student selects a tool, technique, or paradigm that achieves a basic representation as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation but some of the development of the material is inadequate.

5.15 points

Student selects an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the desired goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation.

5.6 points

Student shows a deep understanding of the audience and the situation by selecting material that enhances understanding. Student creates tools, techniques, or paradigms that effectively achieve the desired goal.

Synthesis

0 points

Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable.

3.84 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.

4.22 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.

4.42 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.

4.8 points

Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

3.52 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

3.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

3.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

3.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

3.68 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NUR 630 Assignment: Visual Model

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NUR 630 Assignment: Visual Model