Personal Philosophy Essay

Personal Philosophy Essay

 

To have a personal philosophy guiding one’s career is to have a guiding blueprint in the governance of one’s conduct, priorities, and goals at the workplace. A thriving personal philosophy almost duplicitously reflects the core values of the organization, its mission, vision, and purpose. A personal philosophy radiates through leadership or interpersonal engagement with fellow employees or while handling clients. The outcomes of leadership styles depend on the setting; hence one should develop an effective leadership style that yields the highest favorable results.

My leadership philosophies would encompass these core values: Professional Governance, Safety Above All, Our Mission Always, Culture of Ownership, Lifelong learning, Communication is Key, Excellence, Interpersonal Collaboration, Relationship Management, and our People First (Poorchangizi et al., 2019). They imply that one should have professional integrity, should prioritize safety above everything else, adhere to one’s mission and vision as well as that of the organization, embrace learning as a never-ending cycle, communicate effectively, demonstrate excellent performance, have strong interpersonal relationships and manage them accordingly as well as uphold the dignity of people in one’s line of service. These core values generally summarize the organization’s mission and vision, which aligns with my objectives for my career in the field. They clearly guide professional conduct and excellence in one’s practice. For instance, according to Poels et al. (2020), passive-avoidant leadership styles are of higher significance than transformational and transactional leadership styles when analyzed from a nursing home. In other studies, transformational leadership styles were linked to highly positive outcomes similar to the servant, authentic or resonant styles, unlike laissez-faire and passive-avoidant styles that were tied to more negative consequences (Specchia et al., 2021).

My mission statement, therefore, is to provide excellent professional services to the best of my knowledge in my client’s best interests in improving the quality of their lives. On the other hand, my vision statement is to be the most efficient nurse in the world. My core values inspire these, that of the organization and its mission and vision statements.

The CliftonStrengths Assessment profiles my top five strengths: Consistency, Strategic, Deliberative, Relator, and Significance. Being a relator refers to my positive attitude toward cultivating and nurturing human connection. Significance refers to the need to be seen and recognized by others and influence them. Consistency implies balancing scales when dealing with people of certain calibers, ensuring a just environment governed by fairness and integrity. The strategic theme speaks to my ability to transform chaos into orderliness. It enables me to derive perspective in complex situations. Being deliberative alludes to being careful, private, and vigilant. It makes me reserved and calculating in my approach to life. The listed attributes would qualify my leadership style under the spectrum of transformational leadership. They also align with my core values, mission, and vision statements.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Personal Philosophy Essay

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Nonetheless, the values I strive to improve are along the relator and significance themes. Unfortunately, having excellent interpersonal skills comes with a susceptibility to people-pleasing behavior, with the underlying significance theme. Likewise, one might fail to assert dominance in their leadership; hence an individual might be taken for granted, having a relator theme. There should be a clear distinction in leader-servant dynamics to maintain respect and authority. Without clear boundaries, employees are likely to slack, knowing their leaders will not call them out for their mistakes. It explains why passive-avoidant leadership styles excel in nursing homes where intense discipline and monitoring are required to ensure that the jobs are well done, even though this style is generally least favored, according to Specchia et al. (2021).

Development Plan

Elements    
Objectives ·         To improve on elements of my leadership strengths: relator and significance themes  
Strategies ·         Through competence development. Developing skill competence is to derive satisfaction from one’s skills rather than acknowledgment by others, strengthening the quality of my significance theme. It will offer the primary grounds of awareness and acceptance without relying on the perception of others to shape one’s view.

·         Through open communication and boundary formation. It is important for individuals with dominant relator themes to enforce boundaries in their relationships because the lack thereof makes them susceptible to being taken advantage of. It is important for the relator to conduct fruitful networking to increase the quality of one’s relations. Unfortunately, relator-themed people are seen as friendly, which might be misinterpreted as shallow and unserious. Therefore, effective communication is vital when relaying the nature of the relationship so that the relator understands the type of relationship early and paces themselves accordingly moving forward.

·         For example, a frequent practice in areas I am least confident in will help me improve my craft. Others’ admiration of me will come from my skillset. The accurate measure of my abilities would not lie in the eyes of others but in my cultivated competence. Training would also help to improve my significance since I would not have to rely on others for validation and motivation.

·         For example, attending leadership seminars would help me identify qualities and patterns to observe when determining an appropriate relationship.

 

Strengths ·         Consistency

·         Strategic

·         Deliberative

·         Relator

·         Significance

 

 

References

Poels, J., Verschueren, M., Milisen, K. & Vlaeyen, E. (2020). Leadership styles and leadership outcomes in nursing homes: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 1009 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05854-7

Poorchangizi, B., Borhani, F., Abbaszadeh, A., Mirzaee, M., & Farokhzadian, J. (2019). The importance of professional values from nursing students’ perspective. BMC Nursing, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0351-1

Specchia, M. L., Cozzolino, M. R., Carini, E., Di Pilla, A., Galletti, C., Ricciardi, W., & Damiani, G. (2021). Leadership Styles and Nurses’ Job Satisfaction. Results of a Systematic Review. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health18(4), 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041552

 

Georgia Ndifontah

 

Your Signature Theme Report

SURVEY COMPLETION DATE: 04-02-2023

 

Georgia Ndifontah

SURVEY COMPLETION DATE: 04-02-2023

 

Many years of research conducted by The Gallup Organization suggest that the most effective people are those who understand their strengths and behaviors. These people are best able to develop strategies to meet and exceed the demands of their daily lives, their careers, and their families.

A review of the knowledge and skills you have acquired can provide a basic sense of your abilities, but an awareness and understanding of your natural talents will provide true insight into the core reasons behind your consistent successes.

Your Signature Themes report presents your five most dominant themes of talent, in the rank order revealed by your responses to StrengthsFinder. Of the 34 themes measured, these are your “top five.”

Your Signature Themes are very important in maximizing the talents that lead to your successes. By focusing on your Signature Themes, separately and in combination, you can identify your talents, build them into strengths, and enjoy personal and career success through consistent, near-perfect performance.

Relator

Relator describes your attitude toward your relationships. In simple terms, the Relator theme pulls you toward people you already know. You do not necessarily shy away from meeting new people—in fact, you may have other themes that cause you to enjoy the thrill of turning strangers into friends—but you do derive a great deal of pleasure and strength from being around your close friends. You are comfortable with intimacy. Once the initial connection has been made, you deliberately encourage a deepening of the relationship. You want to understand their feelings, their goals, their fears, and their dreams; and you want them to understand yours. You know that this kind of closeness implies a certain amount of risk—you might be taken advantage of—but you are willing to accept that risk. For you a relationship has value only if it is genuine. And the only way to know that is to entrust yourself to the other person. The more you share with each other, the more you risk together. The more you risk together, the more each of you proves your caring is genuine. These are your steps toward real friendship, and you take them willingly.

Significance

You want to be very significant in the eyes of other people. In the truest sense of the word you want to be recognized. You want to be heard. You want to stand out. You want to be known. In particular, you want to

 

be known and appreciated for the unique strengths you bring. You feel a need to be admired as credible, professional, and successful. Likewise, you want to associate with others who are credible, professional, and successful. And if they aren’t, you will push them to achieve until they are. Or you will move on. An independent spirit, you want your work to be a way of life rather than a job, and in that work you want to be given free rein, the leeway to do things your way. Your yearnings feel intense to you, and you honor those yearnings. And so your life is filled with goals, achievements, or qualifications that you crave. Whatever your focus—and each person is distinct—your Significance theme will keep pulling you upward, away from the mediocre toward the exceptional. It is the theme that keeps you reaching.

Consistency

Balance is important to you. You are keenly aware of the need to treat people the same, no matter what their station in life, so you do not want to see the scales tipped too far in any one person’s favor. In your view this leads to selfishness and individualism. It leads to a world where some people gain an unfair advantage because of their connections or their background or their greasing of the wheels. This is truly offensive to you. You see yourself as a guardian against it. In direct contrast to this world of special favors, you believe that people function best in a consistent environment where the rules are clear and are applied to everyone equally. This is an environment where people know what is expected. It is predictable and evenhanded. It is fair. Here each person has an even chance to show his or her worth.

Strategic

The Strategic theme enables you to sort through the clutter and find the best route. It is not a skill that can be taught. It is a distinct way of thinking, a special perspective on the world at large. This perspective allows you to see patterns where others simply see complexity. Mindful of these patterns, you play out alternative scenarios, always asking, “What if this happened? Okay, well what if this happened?” This recurring question helps you see around the next corner. There you can evaluate accurately the potential obstacles. Guided by where you see each path leading, you start to make selections. You discard the paths that lead nowhere. You discard the paths that lead straight into resistance. You discard the paths that lead into a fog of confusion. You cull and make selections until you arrive at the chosen path—your strategy. Armed with your strategy, you strike forward. This is your Strategic theme at work: “What if?” Select. Strike.

Deliberative

You are careful. You are vigilant. You are a private person. You know that the world is an unpredictable

 

place. Everything may seem in order, but beneath the surface you sense the many risks. Rather than denying these risks, you draw each one out into the open. Then each risk can be identified, assessed, and ultimately reduced. Thus, you are a fairly serious person who approaches life with a certain reserve. For example, you like to plan ahead so as to anticipate what might go wrong. You select your friends cautiously and keep your own counsel when the conversation turns to personal matters. You are careful not to give too much praise and recognition, lest it be misconstrued. If some people don’t like you because you are not as effusive as others, then so be it. For you, life is not a popularity contest. Life is something of a minefield. Others can run through it recklessly if they so choose, but you take a different approach. You identify the dangers, weigh their relative impact, and then place your feet deliberately. You walk with care.

NURS_6053_Module03_Week06_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6053_Module03_Week06_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:· A description of your core values.· A personal mission statement, AND· a personal vision statement.
15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes a set of core values. …The response clearly and thoroughly describes a personal mission statement and a personal vision statement.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response describes a set of core values. …The response describes a personal mission statement and a personal vision statement.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response describes a set of core values that is vague or inaccurate. …The response describes a personal mission statement and vision statement that are vague or inaccurate.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes a set of core values that is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile. · A description of two key behaviors you wish to strengthen. *not required to submit CliftonStrengths Assessment.
15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely provides an analysis and detailed summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment. (Not required to submit Clifton Strengths Assessment.) …The response clearly and thoroughly describes two key behaviors to strengthen.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response accurately provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment. (Not required to submit Clifton Strengths Assessment.) …The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. (Not required to submit Clifton Strengths Assessment.) …The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague or inaccurate.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague and inaccurate or is missing. (Not required to submit Clifton Strengths Assessment.) …The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague and inaccurate or is missing.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected · An explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.
50 to >44.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate, complete, and detailed development plan is provided that thoroughly explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected. … The response accurately and thoroughly includes plans on how to achieve a personal vision with specific examples.

44 to >39.0 pts

Good

An accurate development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected. … The response includes plans on how to achieve a personal vision with specific examples.

39 to >34.0 pts

Fair

A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes vague or inaccurate plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some examples or examples are vague.

34 to >0 pts

Poor

A vague and inaccurate development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected or development plan is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately explains plans on how to achieve a personal vision, does not include any examples, or response is missing.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

 

Assignment details:

  • Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
  • Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.
  • Reflect on your results of the CliftonStrengths Assessment*, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.

*not required to submit CliftonStrengths Assessment

The Assignment (2-3 pages):

Personal Leadership Philosophies

Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:

  • A description of your core values.
  • A personal mission and vision statement.
  • An analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile
  • A description of two key behaviors that you wish to strengthen.
  • A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.

 

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Personal Philosophy Essay

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?